“I wouldn’t say he was dirty so much as he was expedient. He was so eager to get the damage done that his head and shoulders went with a punch. He was a fast and furious man. Chuck Wiggins however, was a real dirty fighter, a reckless character. He didn’t care what he did.” –Tommy Loughran
“He has been criticized considerably lately for his ring performances. I attribute that largely to the peculiar style he uses and not any deliberate intent to foul.” —Mike Gibbons
“I categorically state that Harry Greb was not a foul fighter. In my first fight with him my nose was broken. My seconds said that Greb butted me with his head. This I do not accept as factual; and if his head was the weapon, rather than his fists, my head should not have been where it was.” –Gene Tunney
When boxing historians catalogue the “dirtiest” fighters of all-time, Harry Greb’s name always seems to make the list, usually in the top five, right alongside such famous foulsters as Sandy Saddler, Mysterious Billy Smith (undoubtedly the king of all-time filthy fighters), and fellow Pittsburgher Fritzie Zivic. But does he really deserve it? Is Greb’s place among boxing’s sinister elite a justifiable one? Was he in fact a dirty fighter, or is it a bad rap? The question bears a deeper examination.
Most of Greb’s reputation for being a dirty fighter comes from the sensationalized and myth-filled book by James Fair, entitled Give Him to the Angels, a work so full of exaggerations and outright lies that it was pulled from the shelves after only one printing due to threats of lawsuits by Greb’s family. Regardless, the damage was done; the falsehoods in the book were committed to memory and passed down to succeeding generations of fight fans who had nowhere else to go to get information on the late “Pittsburgh Windmill.”
But we live in a time when detailed information on Greb from firsthand sources is readily available to all who seek it. Many opponents stated for the record that Greb was more rough than dirty, and a closer look at his career reveals that not only was Harry not one of the top five dirty fighters of all-time, but he may not have even been one of the top five dirty fighters of his time. Notwithstanding the lower weight divisions, there were three fighters at light-heavyweight and heavyweight alone who outstripped Harry in the area of foul fighting, they being Chuck Wiggins, Kid Norfolk and Captain Bob Roper.
All things added up, these charming gents boasted a combined 19 disqualification losses among them due to dirty fighting. Greb himself had only one and that against Norfolk, who was a de facto dirty fighter and who many feel should have been the one thrown out of the ring that night, not Greb.
It is generally conceded that the blindness in Harry’s right eye was caused by thumbs in his bouts with Norfolk and Roper. Norfolk was thought to have started the damage in their 1921 swatfest and Greb complained of blurred vision following the match. But it was a year later, after fighting Roper, that Greb was seen sporting patches over both eyes following his nasty bout with the Captain.
It was shortly after these battles that Greb became more noticeably guilty of the “dirty” charge placed upon him, mostly due to his incessant holding and hitting. This was no doubt due to Harry having lost his depth perception because of his blind eye, and he had to have a hand on his opponent in order to locate him properly for a blow. All in all, it is amazing that a half-blind fighter can have as much success as Greb did.
It’s also worth noting, as Gibbons did, that Greb’s style was a major factor in this. His erratic, if not reckless, mode of boxing and tactics of non-stop aggression no doubt resulted in some accidental fouls. How could that not happen from time to time, given the way Greb fought? As I wrote in an earlier article: “Harry was most often described as a ‘wildcat,’ due to his boundless aggression, and as a ‘kangaroo’ because of his occasional leaping attack and retreat tactics.”
That said, the fact remains that matchless speed, incredible stamina, limitless imagination and uncanny improvisational skills — among many other attributes — should be Harry Greb’s legacy in the sport, not exaggerated charges of dirty fighting taken from nebulous sources such as apocryphal post-mortem biographies penned only to make a cheap buck. The myth-busting information is out there if one is interested in knowing the truth about the conqueror of Walker, Loughran, Flowers and Tunney, a boxer who is unquestionably one of the greatest of all-time, pound-for-pound.
— Douglas Cavanaugh